My publishing experience with MDPl was notably positive. The online submission system was straightforward and user-friendly, making it easy to navigate through the submission stages. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive... The publisher's adherence to guidelines and practices to ensure the integrity and quality of published research.

我在MDPl的发文体验非常好。在线提交系统界面简洁直观，易于操作。同行评审过程严谨周密，并且审稿人的反馈充满建设性，极大地促进了稿件质量的提升......MDPI对学术准则与惯例的严格遵循，确保了已发表研究成果具有高水准与完整性。

2. Author in Applied Sciences

I had a great experience publishing with MDPI. The online platform provided easy-to-navigate tools and resources, making it easy to manage the manuscript's submission, peer review, and proofreading. The speed of publication was also impressive...Overall, I highly recommend MDPI as a publisher for your research work.

我在MDPI上发表论文的经历非常令人难忘。该平台精心打造的在线系统，配备了直观易用的工具与丰富的资源，极大地简化了从稿件提交到同行评审，再到最终校对的每一个环节，使得整个流程变得流畅而高效。尤为值得一提的是，MDPI的发表速度也令人印象深刻......总体而言，强烈推荐在MDPI发表您的研究成果。

3. Author in Brain Sciences

Good quality publishing organization with high standards of peer review, punctuality and communication, editing and proofreading, and overall professionalism.

高质量的出版机构，具有高水平的同行评审流程，能够及时沟通，编辑和校对具有专业水平。

4. Author in Psychoactives

The thorough peer review enriched the quality of my research, with constructive feedback helping refine the manuscript. This journey strengthened the credibility of my findings and provided a platform contributing to broader academic conversation.

MDPI全面的同行评审提高了我的研究质量，并且审稿人提出了具有建设性的建议，帮助我更好的完善了论文。MDPI严格的审稿流程加强了研究的可信度，并为更广泛的学术交流提供了一个平台。

1. Reviewer for Forests

My experience as an MDPl reviewer was excellent because the process is well managed, transparent, and agile ... This process inevitably creates a relationship of trust between authors, reviewers, and the editor.

我在MDPI担任审稿人的经历非常令人难忘，同行评审流程管理十分完善，整个过程透明简洁…...尤为值得一提的是，MDPI的评审机制在无形中搭建起了一座坚固的信任桥梁，巧妙地连接起了作者、审稿人与编辑这三者之间的重要纽带。

2. Reviewer for Veterinary Sciences

MDPl ensures the quality and objectivity of scientific publications. Throughout the review process, the editors maintain communication and collaborate closely with the reviewers to ensure that the manuscripts adhere to the scientific community's ethical and professional standards.

MDPl确保了科学论文出版的质量和客观性。在整个审稿过程中，编辑与审稿人保持密切沟通和合作，以确保稿件符合科学界的道德和专业标准。

3. Reviewer for JCM

MDPI's initiative to recognize reviewers with discounts on APCs for their next publication is a commendable effort, acknowledging the vital role reviewers play in maintaining the quality of published research. I would highly recommend reviewing for MDPl to my colleagues and peers in the scientific community. 

MDPI对审稿人的下一次发文给予文章处理费 (APC) 折扣的奖励是一项值得赞扬的举措，它认可了审稿人在保证研究质量方面所发挥的重要作用。我强烈建议我的同事和科学界的其他同行为MDPl进行同行评审。

4. Reviewer for Healthcare

The manuscript submission platform was user-friendly, and appreciated the thoroughness of the peer review process ...Overall, it was a rewarding experience contributing to the quality of scientific research through the review process with MDPI.

稿件提交平台对用户十分友好，我很享受整个同行评审的过程…...总的来说，通过参与MDPI的同行评审，能够对提升科研质量做出贡献，对个人发展也是一次有益的经历。